The Coronavirus Hospital Data Debacle


Credit: Shutterstock

Way back at the start of the pandemic, the state of Colorado was one of the very few that made a serious change to its reporting of deaths due to COVID. We began reporting how many people had died because of COVID versus with COVID. That was an essential public health decision that the rest of the nation generally didn’t follow, until now. Why and how has that problem distorted our public health response to this virus?


First, where are we on Omicron? As I reported a few weeks ago, this variant is MUCH less lethal than the original strain. For example, while cases are 235 percent higher than the last wave, deaths are only about 38% of that wave (1). So based on that data, about 1/7th as lethal. In addition, that data likely vastly overestimates the lethality of Omicron. Why? Because we have a serious hospital data reporting problem in a virus that’s more contagious which causes junk data reporting. Let’s dig in.

Join us for a free Regenexx webinar.

The Colorado COVID Death Correction

All public health responses require accurate data reporting. That’s not a statement that’s related to COVID, but the policy response for every disease since Smallpox and Measles. When that data is distorted, it’s tough to know how to deploy resources. More importantly, it’s almost impossible to know how to educate the public so that they can balance behavior modification with going about their lives.

That last part about educating the public is a BIG deal. In a public health sense, panic is not a net positive. Why? because it’s all about balancing the shut down of people’s lives with saving lives. Meaning, more shutdown equals more deaths due to things like missed serious diagnoses and deaths of despair (drug abuse, violence, alcoholism, suicide) so that must be balanced against the lives saved by isolating everyone in society.

In Colorado, our Governor realized this very early in the pandemic. After a news story highlighted several deaths labeled as due to COVID that were really traffic fatalities, he changed our COVID death certificate process by bifurcating it into “died with COVID” versus “died because of COVID” (2,3). The former is a death that should help morph public health policy, the latter, where someone died from a car crash but tested positive while in the hospital, should not.

The COVID Hospitalization Debacle

For our public health response to Omicron, we desperately need accurate hospitalization data. That’s because the early data out of South Africa from the discoverer of this variant was that its effects were less severe than Delta with few people being hospitalized. So are the COVID hospitalization numbers accurate? Nope.

In a recent report, we found out the following (4):

  • At NYU Langone 65% of its COVID-19 patients were “incidentally” found to be infected after admission for other reasons. As a result, the NY governor asked hospitals to begin adjusting their reporting.
  • 53% of 471 COVID-19 patients at Miami’s Jackson Health System were primarily admitted for other reasons
  • At Johns Hopkins, that number was 20%

These numbers should startle and frankly upset you as well. Why? Because we know that hospitals have been testing every person admitted for COVID since the start of the pandemic. While some of this is because of their own public health response, some is also based on financial incentives. Why? At the start of the pandemic, Medicare placed a 20% COVID-19 payment kicker for people treated who had a COVID diagnosis (5). Hence, any hospital administrator worth their salt has been making sure that every admitted patient gets tested.

In response to this inaccurate data, the state of Massachusetts has also recently changed its policy on hospital reporting (6). That new, more accurate system begins today.

This Problem Is Now Magnified by Omicron’s Increased Infectivity

If we test every patient that walks through the door that’s admitted into the hospital and the ability of the virus to spread is increased while the lethality is decreased (i.e. Omicron), our data will be even more messed up. Why? Because the data is distorted by incidental positive tests and the percentage of people who will test positive without symptoms in the general population is higher for Omicron.

Join us for a free Regenexx webinar.

How Do We Fix This?

Colorado, New York, and Massachusetts Governors have demonstrated that this can be fixed. However, will the CDC step up to the plate and require hospitals to report those patients “with COVID” versus those admitted to treat COVID? Only time will tell.

The upshot? Omicron remains a MILD flu-like illness. Based on the data I’ve seen it’s MUCH less lethal than Delta. So get vaccinated, wash your hands, mask up where required, and live your lives, folks.  There’s not much to see here.



(1) The Washinton Post. Four charts that analyze how omicron’s wave compares to previous coronavirus peaks.

(2) CBS 4 Denver. New COVID-19 Death Dispute: Colorado Coroner Says State Mischaracterized Death. Accessed 5/16/20.

(3) Colorado Department of Public Health. Case Data. Accessed 5/16/20

(4) Beckers Hospital Review. Hospitals see more patients ‘with COVID-19’ vs. ‘for COVID-19’.

(5) US Department of Health and Human Services. CARES Act Provider Relief Fund. Accessed 5/5/20.

(6) Boston Globe. Mass. hospitals will begin reporting primary vs. incidental COVID-19 admissions on Monday, DPH says.

Chris Centeno, MD is a specialist in regenerative medicine and the new field of Interventional Orthopedics. Centeno pioneered orthopedic stem cell procedures in 2005 and is responsible for a large amount of the published research on stem cell use for orthopedic applications. View Profile

If you have questions or comments about this blog post, please email us at [email protected]

NOTE: This blog post provides general information to help the reader better understand regenerative medicine, musculoskeletal health, and related subjects. All content provided in this blog, website, or any linked materials, including text, graphics, images, patient profiles, outcomes, and information, are not intended and should not be considered or used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Please always consult with a professional and certified healthcare provider to discuss if a treatment is right for you.

Get Blog Updates by Email

We do not sell, or share your information to third party vendors.

By submitting the form you agree that you’ve read and consent to our Privacy Policy. We may use email, phone, or other electronic means to communicate information about Regenexx.

We will provide information to help you decide whether you want to schedule an evaluation with a Regenexx Physician.

Insurance typically covers evaluations and diagnostic testing (if recommended). Most insurance plans currently do not cover Regenexx Procedures.

Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.